Forensic Inspection and Testimony

The as-found condition is photographed with scale references, measured where geometry matters, and mapped to the incident location, with moisture readings where a wet condition is alleged. Lighting, matting, drainage and traffic flow are recorded at the same visit.

The methodology and conclusions of the opposing report specifically: whether the standards cited apply to the condition, whether the documentation supports the conclusions drawn, whether the opinions stay within the author's stated qualifications, and which records were omitted.

By stating the boundary in the written report first, so it is established before questioning begins. Where a question calls for a discipline outside the qualifications on the CV, the answer says so plainly and identifies the discipline it belongs to.

Aguilar v. Creative Carpets, Scott v. Hartz, Englehaupt v. A.B. Edward and Talley v. Thunder Basin appear on the current CV, and the full testimony history is available for Rule 26 disclosure. No outcomes are characterised on this site.

Yes. A records review, an inspection with a photographic record, a written report, a rebuttal, or testimony where earlier work was done by another expert can each be undertaken separately. Counsel on a close deadline often start with a records review.

A statement of the materials reviewed and the inspection performed, the as-found condition described factually with supporting photographs and measurements, the standards applied, each opinion with the experience supporting it, and the scope limits set out plainly.